Hydrogen has the potential to power much of the modern world with only water as a by-product, but storing...

New Download Links
New Download Links


Hydrogen has the potential to power much of the modern world with only water as a by-product, but storing... crank high voltage movie onlineHydrogen has the potential to power much of the modern world with only water as a by-product, but storing hydrogen safely and efficiently in solid form such as magnesium hydride remains a major obstacle. A significant challenge has been the difficulty of proving the hydriding/dehydriding mechanisms and, therefore, the mechanisms have long been the subject of debate. Here we use in situ ultra-high voltage transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to directly verify the mechanisms of the hydride decomposition of bulk MgH 2 in Mg-Ni alloys. We find that the hydrogen release mechanism from bulk (2m) MgH 2 particles is based on the growth of multiple pre-existing Mg crystallites within the MgH 2 matrix, present due to the difficulty of fully transforming all Mg during a hydrogenation cycle whereas, in thin samples analogous to nano-powders, dehydriding occurs by a ‘shrinking core' mechanism.The storage of hydrogen in solid form as magnesium hydride is a promising technology that is being developed for fuel cells for automotive and stationary applications and to enable safer hydrogen transportation1, 2, 3. Pure magnesium has a hydrogen carrying capacity of around 7.6 wt%, however, the resulting hydride is relatively stable and the temperature must be increased to 300°C at 1 bar H 2 for the hydrogen to be released with acceptable release rate with realistic industry use2. Design goals for on-board storage (automotive) aim for a temperature of hydrogen release of between 60 and 120°C2, however land-based consumer and industrial storage systems do not have such stringent requirements4. Much research on Mg-based H-storage materials is based on ball milled nano-scale powders due to their superior H-sorption properties over bulk powders2, 5. Another approach is to improve the H-sorption properties of bulk powders, for example, by treating liquid Mg-alloys with alkali and alkali-earth metals prior to casting and powder production6. A significant challenge in research on both nano-powders and bulk-powders has been the difficulty of proving the hydriding/dehydriding mechanisms and, therefore, the mechanisms have long been the subject of debate1, 2, 3. Multiple models for the desorption of MgH 2 have been developed and these have been placed in several categories including ‘shrinking core' models3, 7, 8, 9, ‘nucleation and growth' models3, 7, 8, 9, ‘multiple step' kinetic models3, 7, 8, 9, ‘migration and coalescence' (Greenwood and Speight) model10, and an Ostwald ripening model, eg.

Ref.11. Of these models the first two contain largely opposing ideas yet both approaches have been used with some success in the modeling of experimental results from either pressure-composition-temperature (PCT) curves or thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermal analysis (DTA) data3. These techniques and others including in-situ heating X-ray diffraction (XRD)2, 12 and room temperature TEM13, 14, 15, 16 do not give direct evidence of the operating mechanisms. Such evidence requires 4-D data, ie., three dimensional observations over time. As such, in-situ temperature controlled TEM observation is an attractive approach for determining the mechanism of hydrogen release. Three groups have reported using in-situ TEM at 200?kV to observe hydrogen desorption15, 17, 18.

However, conventional TEM with an accelerating voltage of 200?kV has disadvantages including inelastic incident beam interactions with the samples, and the sample dimensions (typically less than 100?nm in thickness) make surface effects more prominent19. Recently Mooij and Dam20 demonstrated in-situ the two dimensional nucleation and growth of single hydride domains of up to several millimeters in diameter by an optical transmission technique (hydrogenography) for thin Mg film. They found that the nucleation and growth process affects the hysteresis between absorption and desorption.Here we show the hydrogen release behavior from MgH 2 in real-time using in situ ultra-high voltage transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and directly verify the mechanisms of the hydride decomposition of bulk MgH 2 in Mg-Ni alloys. The ultra-high accelerating voltage (1,000?kV) enables bulk samples a few micrometers in thickness to be studied which minimizes surface effects19. The observations are then compared with MgH 2 decomposition in thin-samples (tens of nm) with length scale analogous to nano-powders.Figure 1 shows a TEM image and electron diffraction patterns, observed at an acceleration voltage of 300?kV, from a MgH 2 particle produced by hydriding a Mg-Ni-based H-storage alloy.

They show the presence of MgH 2 and also Mg phase as hexagonal shaped Mg grains of around 30 to 60?nm size within the MgH 2 matrix. From the low indexed electron diffraction patterns from MgH 2 [101]* and Mg [001]* taken from the same selected area diffraction method, diffraction spots of (12-1) from MgH 2 and (?210) from Mg overlap. That means the crystallographic orientation relationships (ORs) between MgH 2 and Mg are MgH 2 [101]*//Mg [001]* (beam direction) and MgH 2 (12-1)//Mg (?210) (plane) as well as MgH 2 (101)//Mg (002) since MgH 2 [101]* and Mg [001]* are perpendicular to MgH 2 (101) and Mg (002). The differences of lattice spacings between MgH 2 (12-1) and Mg(?210) as well as between MgH 2 (101) and Mg (002) are both about 4%. This crystallographic orientation would represent a low strain energy situation facilitating the hydriding phase transformation from Mg to MgH 2. Also Figure 1 shows the hexagonal facets of the Mg grains have (100) and (1–10) habit planes within MgH 2. Schober et.al.21 reported the relationships as MgH 2 [001]*//Mg [?1–10] * and MgH 2 (200)//Mg (002), which has a 15.5% lattice mismatch.

Paik et. al.18 measured MgH 2 [001]*//Mg [?210]* and MgH 2 (?110)//Mg (002), which has a 18.4% mismatch.A TEM image and selected area electron diffraction patterns from Mg and MgH 2 phases in a nominally fully hydrogenated sample.Note that the sample in Figure 1 was nominally fully-hydrided and, therefore, it is necessary to consider why a small volume fraction of nano-sized Mg grains remained in the MgH 2 matrix. In the supporting data, Figure S4 shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images prepared from samples quenched at selected times (e.g. 5, 8 and 20?hours) during hydrogen absorption at 340°C and 1?MPa. A large number of small MgH 2 nuclei formed around the Mg dendrite in the early stages of hydrogenation and grew into the Mg phase with time. The cracking of the growing MgH 2 phase in Figure S4 (b) and (c) is associated with the release of strain energy caused by the large volume change of transformation (30.4% at 340°C22). Even after a prolonged period of hydrogenation (e.g. 20?hours in Figure S4 (c)), small islands of the Mg phase are still retained in the MgH 2 matrix.

This is likely due to the impingement of growing MgH 2 effectively providing a barrier against further hydrogen diffusion because the coefficient of hydrogen diffusion in MgH 2 is at least three orders of magnitude less than that in Mg23, and may also be due to strain energy retarding growth as MgH 2-Mg interfaces grow into the last small Mg islands surrounded by MgH 2 (e.g. Figure 1). Therefore, a key finding in this work is that some Mg phase is retained after a ‘full' hydrogenation cycle. Importantly, it is expected that some Mg will be retained also at the end of recharging of industrial H-storage systems based on MgH 2 bulk powder. This has a significant effect on dehydriding mechanisms as shown in the next sections.In-situ TEM observations were performed on a ~2m particle of bulk powder at an acceleration voltage of 1,000?kV with a heating holder and a high resolution video recorder.

The temperature at the TEM sample grid over the time of observation is in the supporting data ( Figure S1). The average heating rate is approximately 13°C/min from 28 to 455°C. Concerns that the insulation effects between the TEM sample grid and the specimen may render the measured sample temperature inaccurate can be alleviated by comparing the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and TEM data. A comparison of the in-situ hydrogen release observations in the Movie S1, shows the MgH 2 to Mg phase transformation is completed at around 420°C and the DSC experiments in Figure S5 show that the hydrogen release peak temperature was 423°C at a similar heating rate of 15°C/min.Figure 2(a)–(d) shows selected still frame TEM images taken at the temperatures of (a) 300°C, (b) 420°C, (c) 430°C and (d) 455°C (the observation video is available in Movie S1). Several bright grains were observed in the sample in the low temperature range up to 300°C, which correspond to Mg grains, similar to those shown in Figure 1. Those Mg grains subsequently grow and coalesce, with increasing temperature ( Figure 2). There are several large Mg grains at 455°C, which are clearly shown in the low magnification image in Figure 2(e).

These events in the bulk sample correspond well with the DSC shown in the Figure S5 and corresponding Synchrotron XRD data under air and 0.1?MPa conditions in Figure S312. This in-situ TEM result is direct evidence that dehydriding of ~2m bulk MgH 2 particles occurs by the growth of multiple pre-existing Mg grains within a MgH 2 matrix.Selected still frame TEM images from in-situ video of high voltage (1,000?kV) TEM of a ~2m bulk MgH 2 particle taken at (a) 300°C, (b) 420°C, (c) 430°C and (d) 455°C, and (e) a low magnification ...A volume change (shrinkage) of around 30% occurs during hydrogen release associated with the phase transformation from MgH 2 to Mg (30.4% at 340°C reported by Ono et al22), and from Figure 2 and Movie S1, we can see some slight shrinkage of the bulk MgH 2 particle (around 2 micrometers diameter) and Mg grains in the bulk MgH 2 particle with concave shape at 455°C where hydrogen release had stopped. However, there was an absence of any void formation within the bulk particle. It is likely the strain associated with volumetric contraction is accommodated by deformation (including contraction in the transverse direction). At the temperatures involved this deformation appears to be more favourable than the nucleation and growth of porosity, which requires substantial energy.For comparison, in-situ TEM was performed at 200?kV TEM ( Figure 3 and Movie S2).

In this case, the thickness in the observation area is a few tens of nanometers as required for imaging at 200?kV and is at the edge of the sample. Figure 3 shows selected still frame TEM images from the in-situ video in Movie S2 taken at the temperatures of (a) 50°C, (b) 150°C, (c) 250°C, and (d) 380°C. Mg grains form at the thinnest edge of the sample, and progress toward the inside of the MgH 2 sample at ~150°C. This result indicates the mechanism of hydrogen release in this thin section of the sample is quite different from the bulk sample results obtained with high-voltage TEM in Figure 2 and Movie S1. Also, the hydrogen release temperature is much lower than that obtained by high voltage TEM observations ( Figure 2 and Movie S1).

The influence of conventional 200?kV TEM on dehydriding mechanisms includes, (1) the thin (less than 100?nm) sample thickness allowing surface effects to have a disproportionate effect, and (2) the inelastic incident beam interaction with the sample atoms being stronger than at high voltage and, as a result, more pronounced ‘electronic excitation' occurs.Selected still frame TEM images from in-situ video of conventional (200?kV) TEM through a thinned region (a few tens of nm) of a MgH 2 particle taken at (a) 50°C, (b) 150°C, (c) 250°C, and (d) 380°C.From the direct in-situ observations of hydrogen release behavior from the bulk (thick) sample presented in this work, the observations are schematically shown in Figure 4(a), which is closest to the multiple ‘nucleation and growth' model3, with the important difference that small (tens of nm) Mg grains were pre-existing in the sample ( Figure 1) and, therefore, nucleation was not a pre-requisite for the transformation. In this case, the transformation is growth controlled, where hydrogen atoms diffuse from MgH 2 with the driving force for grain boundary movement being derived from the free energy difference between atoms in adjacent grains. Also from Figure 2(e), several areas near the grain surface have remained as MgH 2 and oxide, indicating that even at 455°C, some volume still contains hydrogen as the MgH 2 phase. The existence of both Mg and MgH 2 phases after both charging and discharging is likely to play an important role in hydriding/dehydriding kinetics of bulk powder. The effect of pre-existing Mg grains on the dehydrogenation of MgH 2 was reported by Tanniru et. al.24, using scanning electron microscopy.

They concluded that the nucleation barrier for hexagonal close-packed Mg plays an important role in establishing the hydrogen release temperature. When the magnesium powders are hydrogenated such that the surface is completely covered by the hydride phase, the desorption temperature is found to be high, owing to the energy required for the nucleation of the Mg on the surface. Antisari et. al.25 have confirmed the difficulty of Mg nucleation in MgH 2, and the presence of some retained Mg phase is likely to accelerate dehydriding kinetics. If there were no pre-existing Mg grains, surface nucleation would be easier than nucleation within the volume due to the volume change. However, in the presence of pre-existing Mg grains within the volume, growth from within is more favourable than nucleation and growth from the surface.Schematic hydrogen release mechanisms from a MgH 2 grain: (a) multiple ‘nucleation and growth' model for bulk MgH 2 grains and (b) ‘shrinking core' model for thin MgH 2 TEM samples.The thin sample (tens of nm thick) studied by conventional TEM at 200?kV in Figure 3 and Figure 4(b) may reflect the behavior of fine nano-powders as well as election beam heating effect due to the inelastic incident beam interactions with the samples19.

In this case, the formation of Mg at the sample edge followed by growth into the MgH 2 is consistent with ‘shrinking core' models, where nucleation and growth of Mg phase happen from the edge/surface of the sample. Based on ‘shrinking core' models, Ouyang et. al.26 found the hydriding/dehydriding process in nano-grained (around 30?nm in diameter) of Mg is catalyzed by the combination of in situ formed extremely fine CeH 2/CeH 2.73 and Ni to Mg/MgH 2. The experiments performed were not isothermal and did not enable a comparison of the kinetics of hydrogen transportation through the surrounding MgH 2 phase between the thin and bulk samples. While the overall thickness of the thin samples will be the dominant geometric factor influencing the desorption rate the spatial distribution of any pre-existing Mg nuclei and in particular the distance of these nuclei from the free surface will play an important role in determining the desorption rate of the bulk samples.From in-situ TEM imaging, we conclude that the hydrogen release mechanism from bulk (2m) MgH 2 particles is based on the growth of multiple pre-existing Mg grains (crystallites within the MgH 2 matrix) present due to the difficulty of fully transforming all Mg during a hydrogenation cycle whereas, in thin samples analogous to nano-powders, dehydriding occurs by a ‘shrinking core' mechanism.MgH 2 sample preparationTo prepare samples for hydrogen absorption they were machined to fine chips in air using a drill press. The unreacted chips were of the order of 0.1?mm thick and a few mm in length. Hydrogen sorption was conducted using an automated gravimetric testing apparatus PCTM-5000A (Technosystem Ltd., Japan)27 using laboratory grade high purity H 2 gas (99.98% purity).

The apparatus levitates approximately one gram of the sample material and directly records the weight change using a balance. The details of this machine are described elsewhere6, 27. The samples were ‘hydrided', under conditions of 2?MPa, 350°C for 20?hours. During hydriding, MgH 2 and Mg 2NiH 4 formed and significant cracking occurred, reducing the particle size to a few ?m. All TEM results presented in the main paper are from powder particles containing MgH 2 and no discernable Mg 2NiH 4.Sample preparation for high voltage (1,000?kV) TEM involved selecting single particles of MgH 2 from the reaction product and loading them on a temperature controlled TEM sample holder with a 3?mm diameter grid for high temperature use. Note that particles were examined without any further mechanical/chemical preparations which would be difficult using conventional TEM with 200?kV.Conventional 200?kV TEM was also performed for comparison with the 1,000?kV experiments and to explore the influence of sample thickness and beam heating on dehydriding mechanisms. To produce thin samples for conventional TEM, MgH 2 particles were selected from the hydride powder and fractured in an agate mortar producing fragments with edges a few tens of nanometers in thickness.TEM observationsFor the detailed crystallography of Mg and MgH 2 and their relative orientation relationships, a transmission electron microscopy (TEM), JEM-3200FSK (JEOL, Japan) at acceleration voltage of 300?kV with an Omega filter was used.

In-situ TEM observations were performed using a JEM-1000 (JEOL, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 1,000?kV with an EM-HSTH (JEOL, Japan) heating holder and high resolution video recorder.For comparison with conventional in-situ TEM observations, we used a JEM-2100HCLM (JEOL, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 200?kV with a Model 652 (GATAN, U.S.A.) double tilt heating holder.Author ContributionsK.N. contributed to the planning of all experiments, participating TEM and Synchrotron XRD experiments and writing the article. X.Q.T. contributed to the discussion and conducted DSC and SEM experiments and Synchrotron XRD data analysis. T.Y. contributed to the discussion and TEM experiments and analysis. E.T. contributed to the discussion and TEM experiments and analysis. S.D.M. contributed to the planning of all experiments, discussion, and writing the article. C.M.G. contributed to the interpretation, discussions, and writing the article.

K.Y. contributed to the planning of all experiments, TEM data analysis and discussion. S.M. contributed to the planning of all experiments, TEM data analysis, discussion, and writing the article.This research was supported by a JSPS Fellowship for Research in Japan (S11730), a Kyushu University Short-term Young Scholar Exchange Program, a Smart Futures Fellowship from the Queensland Government, Australia and by Hydrexia Pty. Ltd. We thank Mr. Takahiro Nogita at Film School, Griffith University for video editing, Dr. Qinfen Gu at the Australian Synchrotron for assistance with XRD experiments (AS093/PD1726, AS102/PD/QLD/FI2488 and AS131/PD5782), and the ANFF-Q and CMM at the University of Queensland for use of the DSC and SEM facilities.K.N. holds a patent on modification of hypoeutectic Mg-Ni alloys with alkali and alkali-earth metals (K. Nogita and A. K. Dahle, “Magnesium Alloys for Hydrogen Storage”, International Patent Application No: WO 2006/060851, 2/12/2005) which resulted in a spin-off company Hydrexia Pty. Ltd. which is working to build a commercial H-storage system from this technology.

This letter is about the fundamental mechanisms of dehydriding of MgH 2 and is not related to the claims of the patent and has no direct financial implications on the work of Hydrexia Pty. Ltd. K.N. also supervises an ongoing research project at the University of Queensland funded by Hydrexia Pty. Ltd.Reilly J. J. R H.Wiswall J.The Reaction of hydrogen with alloys of magnesium and nickel and the formation of Mg 2NiH 4. Inorg. Chem. 7, 2254–2256 (1968).Sakintuna B., Lamari-Darkrim F. Hirscher M.Metal hydride materials for solid hydrogen storage: A review. Int.

J. Hydrogen Energy 32, 1121–1140 (2007).Stepura G., Rosenband V. Gany A.A model for the decomposition of titanium hydride and magnesium hydride. J. Alloys Compd. 513, 159–164 (2012).Moroz S.et al. Systems based on hypo-eutectic Mg–Mg 2Ni alloys for medium to large scale hydrogen storage and delivery. J. Alloys Compd. 580, S329–S332 (2013).Dornheim M., Eigen N., Barkhordarian G., Klassen T. Bormann R.Tailoring hydrogen storage materials towards application. Adv.

Eng. Mater. 8, 377–385 (2006).Nogita K.et al. Engineering the Mg-Mg 2Ni eutectic transformation to produce improved hydrogen storage alloys. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34, 7686–7691 (2009).Wang P., Wang A. M., Wang Y. L., Zhang H. F. Hu Z. Q.Decomposition behavior of MgH 2 prepared by reaction ball-milling.

Scripta Mater. 43, 83–87 (2000).Castro F. J. Meyer G.Thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS) method for hydrogen desorption characterization (I): theoretical aspects. J. Alloys Compd. 330–332, 59–63 (2002).Gabis I., Evard E., Voyt A., Chernov I. Zaika Y.Kinetics of decomposition of erbium hydride. J. Alloys Compd.

356–357, 353–357 (2003).Greenwood G. W. Speight M. V.Grain boundary mobility and its effects in materials containing inert gases. Philosophical Magazine 9, 683–689 (1964).Goodhew P. J.Cavity growth mechanism maps. Scripta Mater. 18, 1069–1073 (1984).Nogita K., McDonald S. D., Duguid A., Tsubota M. Gu Q. F.Hydrogen desorption of Mg-Mg 2Ni hypo-eutectic alloys in Air, Ar, CO 2, N 2 and H 2. J. Alloys Compd. 580, S140–S143 (2013).Danaie M. Mitlin D.TEM analysis and sorption properties of high-energy milled MgH 2 powders. J. Alloys Compd.

476, 590–598 (2009).Tanaka K., Miwa T., Sasaki K. Kuroda K.TEM studies of nanostructure in melt-spun Mg–Ni–La alloy manifesting enhanced hydrogen desorbing kinetics. J. Alloys Compd. 478, 308–316 (2009).Isobe S.et al. Study on reaction mechanism of dehydrogenation of magnesium hydride by in situ transmission electron microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett.

96, 223109-223101-223103 (2010).Fujii H.et al. Remarkable hydrogen storage, structural and optical properties in multi-layered Pd/Mg thin films. Materials Transactions 43, 2721–2727 (2002).Danaie M., Tao S. X., Kalisvaart P. Mitlin D.Analysis of deformation twins and the partially dehydrogenated microstructure in nanocrystalline magnesium hydride (MgH 2) powder. Acta Mater. 58, 3162–3172 (2010).Paik B.et al. MgH 2 - Mg phase transformation driven by a high-energy electron beam: An in situ transmission electron microscopy study. Philos.

Mag. Lett. 90, 1–7 (2010).Tanaka M.et al. Sequential multiplication of dislocation sources along a crack front revealed by high-voltage electron microscopy and tomography. J. Mater.

Res. 26, 508–513 (2011).Mooij L. Dam B.Hysteresis and the role of nucleation and growth in the hydrogenation of Mg nanolayers. PCCP 15, 2782–2792 (2013). [ PubMed]Schober T.The magnesium-hydrogen system: Transmission electron microscopy. Metall. Trans. A 12, 951–957 (1981).Ono S.et al.

Phase transformation and thermal expansion of Mg-Ni alloys in a hydrogen atmosphere. Journal of the Less Common Metals 88, 57–61 (1982).?erm?k J. Kr?l L.Hydrogen diffusion in Mg–H and Mg–Ni–H alloys. Acta Mater. 56, 2677–2686 (2008).Tanniru M., Tien H.-Y. Ebrahimi F.Study of the dehydrogenation behavior of magnesium hydride. Scripta Mater. 63, 58–60 (2010).Antisari M. V.et al. Scanning electron microscopy of partially de-hydrogenated MgH 2 powders. Intermetallics 17, 596–602 (2009).Ouyang L. Z.et al.

Enhanced hydrogen storage kinetics and stability by synergistic effects of in situ formed CeH 2.73 and Ni in CeH 2.73-MgH 2-Ni nanocomposites. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 118, 7808–7820 (2014).Yamada A. Funatsu T.Measuring system for absorbed hydrogen using magnetic levitation system. Fuel Cell (Japan) 4, 25–29 (2004).

Scientific Reports : Evidence of the hydrogen release mechanism in bulk MgH2